Search
Close this search box.

Poll Shows Kim Brimer Prime for Upset

Lone Star Project poll and research show Kim Brimer unknown, vulnerable

A recent Lone Star Project poll reveals that Republican State Senator Kim Brimer has squandered almost 20 years in public office to remain largely unknown in his own backyard. With little to show for his time in Austin other than negative press accounts detailing questionable ethics, Brimer is clearly vulnerable to an adequately funded mainstream challenger. Without question, Tarrant County activists currently considering a challenge to Brimer are on solid ground.

The Lone Star Project commissioned the respected polling firm Opinion Analysts to conduct a survey of Texas Senate District 10 to help determine the viability of a challenge to incumbent Republican State Senator Kim Brimer. (see methodology below) The poll confirms earlier Lone Star Project vote analysis indicating underlying strength for a Democratic challenger and surprising weakness by the incumbent Brimer.

Poll Exposes Brimer Vulnerability

Despite holding public office in Tarrant County since 1988, first as a member of the State House and now as Senator from SD10, Kim Brimer is largely unknown within his own district. Less than 20 percent of those surveyed give Brimer a “favorable” rating and nearly 50 percent know so little about Brimer that they cannot rate him at all, which is extraordinary for a 20 year office holder.

In addition, other prominent Republican office holders have surprisingly low approval and/or performance ratings for a district previously considered safe for a Republican incumbent. Finally, Brimer’s own questionable ethics leave him particularly vulnerable to a mainstream Democrat who can build a coalition of Democratic partisans, independents and some “soft” Republicans.

Kim Brimer Favorability Rating
18.3% Favorable
25.1% Neutral
7.0% Unfavorable
49.7% Haven’t Heard Of
(Source: LSP Poll, SD10 General Election Survey – May, 2007)

Kim Who?

When asked their opinion of Kim Brimer, nearly 50 percent of those surveyed had never heard of him. Another 25 percent had a only neutral” opinion.  Incredibly, after more then nearly 20 years as a Tarrant County office holder, 75 percent of voters surveyed know so little about Kim Brimer that they had no strong opinion at all.

Kim Brimer Re-elect
27.4% Re-elect
25.0% Prefer Democrat
47.7% Depends
(Source: LSP Poll, SD10 General
Election Survey – May, 2007)

Surprisingly Low Re-Elect Numbers

When asked: “Would you like to see Kim Brimer re-elected as your State Senator, or would you prefer to see someone else in his place?” only 27.4 percent of SD 10 voters surveyed said they want to see Brimer Re-elected.

Kim Brimer Job Approval
1.20% Excellent
22.20% Good
33.50% Only Fair
11.10% Poor
31.90% Don’t Know
(Source: LSP Poll, SD10 General
Election Survey – May, 2007)

Job “Dis” Approval Ratings

Less than 25 percent of survey respondents give Brimer an “Excellent” or “Good” rating, while over 75 percent rate him “Only Fair”, “Poor” or “Don’t Know.”

Sen. John Cornyn Favorability
31.6% Favorable
30.9% Neutral
14.9% Unfavorable
22.5% Haven’t Heard Of
George W. Bush Job Approval
42.9% Approve
8.2% Mixed/Depends
46.5% Disapprove
2.4% No Opinion
(Source: LSP Poll, SD10 General Election Survey – May, 2007

No Coat-tails

For more than a decade, “down ballot” Republican candidates in Texas have enjoyed a boost from George W. Bush and other “top of the ticket” GOP candidates. The survey indicates, however, that in SD10 “top of the ticket” Texan John Cornyn carries the same low approval ratings that have appeared in statewide surveys and, perhaps more telling, Geoge W. Bush has a higher job “disapproval” than “approval.” Just 31.6% of the voters surveyed have a favorable opinion of Senator John Cornyn and 46.5% disapprove of the job George W. Bush is doing as President.

Kim Brimer “rent to own” Scheme
4.9% More Likely
14.7% No Difference
80.4% Less Likely
(Source: LSP Poll, SD10 General Election Survey – May, 2007

Brimer – Chairman of Corrupt Caucus

Kim Brimer’s ethical problems have been well publicized. Most notably, Brimer pioneered the sleazy practice of using special interest campaign contributions to make mortgage payments disguised as “rent” on a second home kept in the name of a spouse. Brimer used the scheme to funnel over $200,000 to his wife to pay for a second home in Austin. When survey respondents were asked if this activity would affect their level of support, 80% said it made them less likely to vote for Brimer. What’s more, Brimer encouraged other elected officials to engage in this same unethical behavior. (Fort Worth Star-Telegram, February 22, 2007)

Poll Methodology

The report above is a summary report of the results of 400 interviews with likely General election voters in Texas State Senate District 10. The interviews were conducted May 23 through 30, 2007. The results of a random sample survey of this size are statistically accurate to within +/- 4.9% at the 95% confidence level.

The Latest

News

What Happens If We Have a Presidential Election and No One Wins?

News, Video

Ted Cruz Podcast is a PodCASH Scandal

Video

Brandi Croffie: Eviction Specialist

Video

Vote Roderick Miles for County Commissioner