Search
Close this search box.

Motion Filed to Compel Federal Court to Rule on Texas Redistricting

After years of deliberation, plaintiff groups call on Court to rule by January 17th
The major plaintiffs challenging the Texas congressional and State House boundaries filed a joint motion earlier today to compel the three-judge federal district court in San Antonio to finally issue a decision on their claims that the Texas maps adopted in 2011 are discriminatory in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution.  The motion can be viewed and downloaded here.
 
The current Texas congressional and State House maps are based on interim plans ordered by the Court in 2012; however, these plans retain many of the features that plaintiffs argue discriminate against Hispanic and African American voters – specifically in Corpus Christi, San Antonio, the border region, Travis County and Dallas/Fort Worth. 
 
The motion lays out plainly that continued delay not only allows ongoing harm to minority voters but could prevent resolution of the case before a new census is taken:
“Plaintiffs make this request out of concern that without resolution of their claims regarding the 2011 redistricting plans for the Texas House of Representatives and Texas Congressional districts, redistricting plans adopted to disadvantage minority voters will not be completely remedied in time for yet another election in 2018. In addition, Plaintiffs fear that any further delay in the entry of judgment on their claims, when considering the remaining issues yet to be litigated and concomitant potential appeals, may be overlapped by the release of a new census in 2021. Thus, further delay may interfere with a final and complete resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims.”
A decision from the court is long overdue.  It has been nearly six years since the complaints were initially filed and more than two years since the trial on the merits of the case concluded.  Plaintiffs’ detail the degree to which the case has dragged on:
“The current status of this case has remained unchanged since the 2014 trial (now over 28 months) and since this Court’s order denying Plaintiffs a preliminary injunction. The litigants in this cause have had two trials totaling hundreds of hours of testimony and thousands of pages of exhibits and evidence. All pending issues have been briefed extensively. Plaintiffs have survived multiple attempts to dismiss this cause of action. There has been one interlocutory appeal and more contentious appeals loom on the horizon. It has been 2064 days since the filing of this lawsuit. It has been 1,748 days since this Court ordered its second interim maps. It has been 758 days since final post trial briefing was filed in this cause. In the ensuing elections, more than 19 million votes have been cast in Texas general elections using maps that plaintiffs contend violate the United States Constitution and federal law.”  
< /table>
While expressing their understanding of the complexity of the case and the difficulty of the issues to be resolved, the plaintiffs make clear that they will seek relief in an appellate court if the District Court does not rule on the case by January 17, 2017:
“Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request an entry of judgment no later than January 17, 2017. Should no order be forthcoming from this Court in the near future, private plaintiffs will consider this motion effectively denied.  In that event, we will have no alternative but to seek appropriate appellate review and relief directing this Court to take action by a date certain. Cf. Veasey v. Abbott, 136 S. Ct. 1823, 194 L. Ed. 2d 828 (2016) (in which the U.S. Supreme Court directed the Fifth Circuit to resolve the Texas photo ID challenge by a date certain and inviting the plaintiffs to return to the Court for relief if no decision was reached in the Fifth Circuit by the Supreme Court’s deadline).”
Statement by Lone Star Project Director Matt Angle:
“Texas Republicans adopted maps that are off the charts in terms of racial and partisan gerrymandering.  They grossly and intentionally discriminate against Hispanic and African American Texans, which harms every Texas citizen.
 
“The Court has a hard and complicated job sorting out how extensively Texas Republicans have violated the law, but a decision is needed now so that the work to repair damage being done to all Texas voters can begin.”
 
Additional Background:
The Lone Star Project has been engaged in the Texas redistricting fight from the outset, supporting the overall efforts of the plaintiffs in the case and providing technical and financial support to the Quesada Plaintiffs.  Earlier this week, Lone Star Project Direct Matt Angle sent a memo to Lone Star Project supporters providing more background and context on the pending redistricting case.  The memo can be seen here.

 

The Latest

News

John Cornyn Can’t Count on Texas Republicans

News, Statements, Video

Tarrant County Sheriff Bill Waybourn Ad

News, Video

Video: Voter Suppression & Intimidation is the Go-To Play

News

Tim O’Hare Delivering on His Promise of Racism